The Sale of Joseph in Genesis 37:18–26: Narrative Cohesion and Coherence
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5508/jhs29634Keywords:
Genesis 37, Documentary Hypothesis, (Neo-)Documentarian, J/E source, cohesion, coherence, narrative, narrative link, Joseph Story, Midian(ite), Ishmael(ite)Abstract
The purpose of this discussion is to assess the ability of the Documentary Hypothesis to provide a compelling reading of Genesis 37. Is the literary reconstruction of the J/E source divisions able to offer a compelling, internally consistent text? As a counter proposal, I consider the framework of coherence theory as a means of evaluating the central claim of documentarians that Genesis 37 lacks compositional cohesion and coherence. The method of this discussion takes the following course. First, I sketch out a brief overview of the various compositional approaches to Genesis 37 and its place in the Joseph story. Second, I consider the nature of narrative cohesion and coherence and how these concepts inform one’s reading of Genesis 37, arguing that the markers of cohesion embedded in the narrative provide a means of guiding the reader coherently through the twists and turns of the plot line. Third, I highlight several narrative links that cross proposed source boundaries, functioning as linguistic signals for cohesion, and that suggest literary coherence. Fourth, I re-assess the so-called Ishmaelite/Midianite problem that has served a central role in most source divisions of Genesis 37.
References
Alter, Robert. The Art of Biblical Narrative. Rev. and upd. ed. New York: Basic Books, 2011.
Baddeley, A. “Working Memory.” Science 31 (1992): 556–69.
Baddeley, A. “Working Memory and Conscious Awareness.” Pages 13–28 in Theories of Memory. Edited by A. F. Collins, S. E. Gathercole, M. A. Conway, and P. E. Morris. Hove, England: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1993.
Baden, Joel S. J, E, and the Redaction of the Pentateuch. FAT 68. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2009.
Baden, Joel S. The Composition of the Pentateuch: Renewing the Documentary Hypothesis. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2012.
BDB = Brown, Francis, S. R. Driver, and Charles A. Briggs. The Brown-Driver-Briggs Hebrew and English Lexicon: With an Appendix Containing the Biblical Aramaic. Boston: Houghton, Mifflin, and Company, 1906. Reprinted, Peabody: Hendrickson, 1999.
Blum, Erhard. “Zwischen Literarkritik und Stilkritik: Die diachrone Analyse der literarischen Verbindung von Genesis und Exodus—im Gespräch mit Ludwig Schmidt.” ZAW 124 (2012): 492–515.
Blum, Erhard, and Kristin Weingart. “The Joseph Story: Diaspora Novella or North-Israelite Narrative?” ZAW 129 (2017): 501–21.
Carpenter, J. Estlin, and George Harford. The Composition of the Hexateuch: An Introduction with Select Lists of Words and Phrases. London: Longmans, Green, and Co., 1902.
Dietrich, Walter. Die Josephserzählung als Novelle und Geschichtsschreibung: Zugleich ein Beitrag zur Pentateuchfrage. Biblisch-theologische Studien. Neukirchen-Vluyn: Neukirchener Verlag, 1989.
Dillmann, August. Die Genesis. 3rd ed. Leipzig: S. Hirzel, 1892.
Donner, Herbert. Die literarische Gestalt der alttestamentlichen Josephsgeschichte. Heidelberg: Winter, 1976.
Driver, S. R. The Book of Genesis. 4th ed. London: Methuen & Co., 1905.
Dumbrell, William J. “Midian: A Land or League?” VT 25 (1975): 323–37.
Ede, Franziska. Die Josefsgeschichtliche: Literarkritische und redaktionsgeschichtliche Untersuchungen zur Entste-hung von Gen 37–50. BZAW 485. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2016.
Ede, Franziska. “The Literary Development of the Joseph Story.” Pages 103–20 in Book-Seams in the Hexateuch I: The Literary Transitions between the Books of Genesis/Exodus and Joshua/Judges. Edited by Christoph Berner and Harald Samuel. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2018.
Ewald, Heinric. Geschichte des Volkes Israel. 3rd ed. Volume 1. Göttingen: Dieterichschen Buchhandlung, 1864.
Fetzer, Anita. “Textual Coherence as a Pragmatic Phenomenon.” In The Cambridge Handbook of Pragmatics. Edited by Kasia Allan and M. Jaszczolt. Cambridge University Press, 2012.
Fokkelman, Jan P. “Genesis 37 and 38 at the Interface of Structural Analysis and Hermeneutics.” Pages 152–87 in Literary Structure and Rhetorical Strategies in the Hebrew Bible. Edited by L. J. de Regt, J. de Waard, and J. P. Fokkelman. Assen, The Netherlands: Van Gorcum, 1996.
Fokkelman, Jan P. Reading Biblical Narrative: An Introductory Guide. Translated by Ineke Smit. Louisville: Westminster John Knox, 2000.
Giora, Rachel. “Notes Towards a Theory of Text Coherence.” Poetics Today 6 (1985): 699–715.
Greenstein, Edward L. “An Equivocal Reading of the Sale of Joseph.” Pages 114–25 in Literary Interpretations of Biblical Narratives. Volume 2. Edited by Kenneth R. R. Gros Louis. Nashville: Abingdon, 1982.
Gunkel, Hermann. Genesis. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1902.
Gunkel, Hermann. “Die Komposition der Joseph-Geschichten.” ZDMG 76 (1922): 57–71.
Gunkel, Hermann. The Legends of Genesis: The Biblical Saga & History. Translated by W. H. Carruth. New York: Schocken Books, 1964.
Halliday, M. A. K., and Ruqaiya Hasan. Cohesion in English. New York: Routledge, 1976.
Haran, Menahem. “The Bĕrît ‘Covenant’: Its Nature and Ceremonial Background.” Pages 203–19 in Tehillah le-Moshe: Biblical and Judaic Studies in Honor of Moshe Greenberg. Edited by Mordechai Cogan, Barry L. Eichler, and Jeffrey H. Tigay. Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns, 1997.
Haran, Menahem. The Biblical Collection: Its Consolidation to the End of the Second Temple Times and 21 Changes of Form to the End of the Middle Ages. 3 volumes. Jerusalem: Magnes, 1996–2008. Hebrew.
HALOT = Köhler, Ludwig, and Walter Baumgartner. The Hebrew and Aramaic Lexicon of the Old Testament. 2 volumes. Translated and edited by M. E. J. Richardson. Leiden: Brill, 2001.
Holzinger, Heinrich. Genesis: Erklärt. Leipzig: J. C. B. Mohr, 1898.
Humphreys, W. Lee. Joseph and His Family: A Literary Study. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press, 1988.
Josephus. The Works of Josephus: Complete and Unabridged. Translated by William Whiston. Peabody, MA: Hendrickson, 1987.
Kebekus, Norbert. Die Joseferzählung literarkritische und redaktionsgeschichtliche Untersuchungen zu Genesis 37–50. Münster: Waxmann, 1990.
Kessler, Rainer. Die Querverweise im Pentateuch: Überlieferungsgeschichtliche Untersuchungen der expliziten Querverbindungen innerhalb des vorpriesterlichen Pentateuchs. BEATAJ 56. Frankfurt: Peter Lang, 2015.
Knauf, E. A. Midian: Untersuchungen zur Geschichte Palästinas und Nordarabiens am Ende des 2. Jahrtausends v. Chr. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz, 1988.
Knauf, E. A. “Midianites and Ishmaelites.” Pages 147–62 in Midian, Moab and Edom: The History and Archaeology of Late Bronze and Iron Age Jordan and North-West Arabia. Edited by John F. A. Sawyer and David J. A. Clines. JSOTSup 24. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press, 1983.
Lyons, Michael A. “Standards of Cohesion and Coherence: Evidence from Early Readers.” HeBAI 9 (2020): 183–208.
Mendenhall, George E. “Midian.” ABD 4 (1992): 815–18.
Park, H., and L. M. Reder. “Moses Illusion: Implications for Human Cognition.” Pages 275–92 in Cognitive Illusions. Edited by R. F. Pohl. Hove, England: Psychology Press, 2004.
Redford, Donald B. A Study of the Biblical Story of Joseph (Genesis 37–50). VTSup 20. Leiden: Brill, 1970.
Rendsburg, Gary A. How the Bible is Written. Peabody, MA: Hendrickson, 2019.
Robar, Elizabeth. “Cohesion and Coherence.” In Encyclopedia of Hebrew Language and Linguistics. Edited by Geoffrey Khan. Leiden: Brill, 2013.
Römer, Thomas. “The Joseph Story in the Book of Genesis: Pre-P or Post-P?” Pages 185–201 in The Post-Priestly Pentateuch: New Perspectives on it Redactional Development and Theological Profiles. Edited by Federico Giuntoli and Konrad Schmid. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2015.
Ruppert, L. “Zur neueren Diskussion um die Joseferz hlung in der Genesis.” BZ.NF 33 (1989): 92–97.
Schmidt, L. Literarische Studien zur Josefsgeschichte. BZAW 167. Berlin: de Gruyter, 1986.
Schmitt, Hans-Christoph. Die nichtpriesterliche Josephsgeschichte. Beihefte Zur Zeitschrift Für die Alttestamentliche Wissensch. Repr., Berlin: De Gruyter, 2018.
Schorn, Ulrike. Ruben und das System der zwölf Stämme Israels. Beihefte Zur Zeitschrift Für die Alttestamentliche Wissensch. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2012.
Schwartz, Baruch J. “The Priestly Account of the Theophany and Lawgiving at Sinai.” Pages 103–34 in Texts, Temples, and Traditions: A Tribute to Menahem Haran. Edited by Michael V. Fox, Victor Avigdor Hurowitz, Avi M. Hurvitz, Michael L. Klein, Baruch J. Schwartz, and Nili Shupak. Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns, 1996.
Schwartz, Baruch J. “Israel’s Holiness: The Torah Traditions.” Pages 47–59 in Purity and Holiness: The Heritage of Leviticus. Edited by Marcel JHM Poorthuis and Joshua Schwartz. JCPS 2. Leiden: Brill, 2000.
Schwartz, Baruch J. “Reexamining the Fate of the ‘Canaanites’ in the Torah Traditions.” Pages 151–70 in Sefer Moshe: The Moshe Weinfeld Jubilee Volume. Edited by Chaim Cohen, Avi Hurwitz, and Shalom M. Paul. Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns, 2004.
Schwartz, Baruch J. “How the Compiler of the Pentateuch Worked: the Composition of Genesis 37.” Pages 263–78 in The Book of Genesis: Composition, Reception, and Interpretation. Edited by Craig A. Evans, Joel N. Lohr, and David L. Petersen. VTSup 152. Leiden: Brill, 2012.
Ska, Jean Louis. “Foreword.” Pages vii–viii in Matthew C. Genung, The Composition of Genesis 37: Incoherence and Meaning in the Exposition of the Joseph Story. FAT 2/95. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2017.
Skinner, John. Genesis: A Critical and Exegetical Commentary. ICC. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1910.
Stackert, Jeffrey. “Distinguishing Innerbiblical Exegesis from Pentateuchal Redaction: Leviticus 26 as a Test Case.” Pages 369–86 in The Pentateuch: International Perspectives on Current Research. Edited by Thomas B. Dozeman, Konrad Schmid, and Baruch J. Schwartz. FAT 78. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2011.
Stackert, Jeffrey. A Prophet Like Moses: Prophecy, Law, and Israelite Religion. New York: Oxford University Press, 2014.
Stackert, Jeffrey. “Pentateuchal Coherence and the Science of Reading.” Pages 253–68 in The Formation of the Pentateuch: Bridging the Academic Cultures of Europe, Israel, and North America. Edited by Jan C Gertz, Bernard M Levinson, Dalit Rom-Shiloni, and Konrad Schmid. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2016.
Steiner, Richard C. “Contradictions, Culture Gaps, and Narrative Gaps in the Joseph Story.” JBL 139 (2020): 439–58.
Teeter, D. Andrew, and William A. Tooman. “Standards of (In)coherence in Ancient Jewish Literature.” HeBAI 9 (2020): 106–29.
Toffelmire, Colin M. “Cohesion and Genre Blending in Prophetic Literature, Using Amos 5 as a Case Study.” JHS 21 (2021): 1–22.
Von Rad, Gerhard. “Josephsgeschichte und ältere Chokmah.” Pages 120–27 in Congress Volume: Copenhagen 1953. VTSup 1. Leiden: Brill, 1953.
Von Rad, Gerhard. Genesis: A Commentary. Revised edition. Old Testament Library. Philadelphia: Westminster Press, 1972.
Wellhausen, Julius. Die Composition des Hexateuchs und der historischen Bücher des alten Testaments. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 1963.
Westermann, Claus. Genesis 37–50. Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 1986.
Westermann, Claus. Genesis. Translated by David E Green. Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 1987.
Whybray, R. N. “The Joseph Story and Pentateuchal Criticism.” VT 18 (1968): 528.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Matthew McAffee
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Statue of Ebih-Il, drawing by Simeon Goa, © Journal of Hebrew Scriptures
