Form, Content, and Meaning in Leviticus 24:10–23: A Diachronic Analysis

Itzhak Amar

doi:10.5508/jhs29685

Authors

Itzhak Amar Bar Ilan University https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0202-0801

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5508/jhs29685

Keywords:

Leviticus, Holiness Code, Lex Talionis, Narrative

Abstract

The narrative of the blasphemer (Lev 24:10–23)—the only narrative segment within the Holiness Code (Lev 17–26)—has long been a subject of scholarly debate. Discussions have primarily focused on issues of textual coherence and thematic connections, such as the link between the prohibition against desecrating God's name and the subsequent inclusion of case laws that align with the principle of lex talionis (the law of retaliation). In this article, I aim to address the complex questions raised by this passage and propose that it should be understood as a cohesive unit consisting of two sequential stages. The arrangement of these stages not only emphasizes their inherent connections but also sheds light on the underlying rationale that shapes the structure and purpose of this narrative unit.

References

Arneth, Martin. Durch Adams Fall ist ganz verderbt...: Studien zur Entstehung der alttestamentlichen Urgeschichte. FRLANT 217. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2007.

Chavel, Simeon. Oracular Law and Priestly Historiography in the Torah. FAT II 71. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2014.

Cholewinski, Alferd. Heiligkeitsgesetz und Deuteronomium: Eine vergleichende Studie. AnEib 66. Rome: Biblical Institute, 1976.

Douglas, Mary. Leviticus as Literature. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.

Gabel, John B. and Wheeler, Charles B. “The redactor's hand in the blasphemy pericope of Leviticus xxiv,” VT 30 (1980): 227-229.

Graf, Karl H. Die geschichtlichen Bücher des Alten Testaments: Zwei historisch-kritische Untersuchungen. Leipzig: T.O. Weigel, 1866.

Greenberg, Moshe. “Notes on the Influence of Tradition on Ezekiel.” JANES 22 (1993): 29-37.

Hopf, Matthias. “Fremd-Sein im Heiligkeitsgesetz.” Pages 249-266. in Migration und Theologie: Historische Reflexionen, theologische Grundelemente und hermeneutische Perspektiven aus der alt- und neutestamentlichen Wissenschaft. Edited by Benedikt Hensel and Christian Wetz. Leipzig: Evangelische Verlagsanstalt Leipzig, 2023.

Hutton, Rodney R. “The case of the Blasphemer Revisited (Lev. xxiv 10-23),” VT 49 (1999): 532-541.

Jackson, Bernard S. Studies in the Semiotics of Biblical Law. JSOTSup 314. Sheffield: T & T Clark, 2000.

Jeon, Jaeyoung. From the Reed Sea to Kadesh: A Redactional and Socio-Historical Study of the Pentateuchal Wilderness Narrative. FAT 159. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2022.

Johnson, Dylan R. Sovereign Authority and the Elaboration of Law in the Bible and the Ancient Near East. FAT II 122. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2020.

Kamionkowski, Tamar S. “Leviticus 24,10-23 in Light of H's Concept of Holiness.” Pages 72-96. The Strata of the Priestly Writings: Contemporary Debate and Future Directions. Edited by Sarah Shectman and Joel S. Baden. Zürich: Theologischer Verlag, 2009.

Knohl, Israel. The Sanctuary of Silence: The Priestly Torah and the Holiness School.Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 1995.

Kopilovitz, Ariel. Israel’s Future in Ezekiel’s Restoration Oracles (Ezekiel 33–37. Ph.D. Dissertation. Hebrew University, Jerusalem, 2018.

Leuchter, Mark. “The Ambiguous Details in the Blasphemer Narrative: Sources and Redaction in Leviticus 24:10-23,” JBL 130 (2011): 431-450.

Lyons, Michael. From Law to Prophecy: Ezekiel’s Use of the Holiness Code. LHBOTS 507. New York: T & T Clark, 2009.

Lyons, Michael. “How Have We Changed? – Older and Newer Arguments about the Relationship between Ezekiel and the Holiness Code.” Pages 1055-1074. in The Formation of the Pentateuch – Bridging the Academic Cultures of Europe, Israel and North America. Edited by Jan C. Gertz et al. FAT 111. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2016.

Milgrom, Jacob. “The Desecration of YHWH’s Name: Its Parameters and Significance.” In Pages 69-79. in Birkat Shalom: Studies in the Bible, Ancient Near Eastern Literature, and Postbiblical Judaism Presented to Shalom M. Paul on the Occasion of His Seventieth Birthday. Edited by Chaim Cohen et al. Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns, 2009.

Nihan, Christoph. “The Holiness Code between D and P: Some Comments on the Function and Significance of Leviticus 17-26 in the Composition of the Torah.” Pages 81-122. in Das Deuteronomium zwischen Pentateuch und Deuteronomistischem Geschichtswerk. Edited by Eckart Otto and Reinhard Achenbach. FRLANT 206. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2004.

Nihan, Christophe. From Priestly Torah to Pentateuch: A Study in the Composition of the Book of Leviticus. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2007.

Nihan, Christophe L. “Ezekiel and the Holiness Legislation: A Plea for Nonlinear Models.” Pages 1015-1040. in The Formation of the Pentateuch – Bridging the Academic Cultures of Europe, Israel and North America. Edited by Jan C. Gertz et al. FAT 111. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2016.

Otto, Eckart. “Das Heiligkeitsgesetz Leviticus 17-26 in der Pentateuchredaktion.” Pages 65-80. in Aites Testament, Forschung und Wirkung: Festschrift filr Henning GrafReventlow. Edited by Peter Mommer and Winfried Thiel. Frankfurt am Main: P. Lang, 1994.

Trevaskis, Leigh M. “The Purpose of Leviticus 24 within its Literary Context.” VT 59 (2009): 295-312.

Rhyder, Julia. Centralizing the Cult: The Holiness Legislation in Leviticus 17–26. FAT 134. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2019.

Röhrig, Meike. “Gesetz und Erzählung in Num 15: Redaktionsgeschichtliche Überlegungen zum Sabbatsünder (Num 15,32–36).” ZAW 131 (2019): 407-421.

Ruwe, Andreas. “Heiligkeitsgesetz” und “Priesterschrift”: Literaturgeschichtliche und rechtssystematische Untersuchungen zu Leviticus 17,1-26,2. FAT 26. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 1999.

Schwartz, Baruch J. “The Bearing of Sin in the Priestly Literature.” Pages 3-21. in Pomegranates and Golden Bells; Studies in Biblical, Jewish, and Near Eastern Ritual, Law, and Literature in Honor of Jacob Milgrom. Edited by David P. Wright, David N. Freedman and Avi Hurvitz. Winona Lake: Eisenbrauns, 1995.

Schwartz, Baruch. The Holiness Legislation: Studies in the Priestly Code. Jerusalem: Magnes, 1999 (Heb).

Stackert Jeffrey. Rewriting the Torah: Literary Revision in Deuteronomy and the Holiness Legislation. FAT 52. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2007.

Sun, Henry T.C. An Investigation into the Compositional integrity of the so-called Holiness Code (Leviticus 17-26). Ph.D. Dissertation; Claremont Graduate School, 1990.

Vroom, Jonathan. “Recasting Mispàtîm: Legal Innovation in Leviticus 24:10-23.” JBL 131 (2012): 27-44.

Weingreen, Jacob. “The Case of the Blasphemer (Leviticus XXIV 10 ff.).” VT 22 (1972): 118-23.

Willis, Timothy M. “Blasphemy, Talion, and Chiasmus: The Marriage of Form and Content in Lev 24,13-23.” Biblica 90 (2009): 68-74.

Zakovitch, Yair. ‘For three and for four’: The three-four literary model in the Bible. Ph.D. Dissertation. Hebrew University, Jerusalem, 1977.